We condemn the UN: a human rights violator and a gynocentric org.

 The UN: a human rights violator and a gynocentric org. Men should condemn it

United-Nations-Headquarters- New York

The context is whether we give prizes to failed persons? Another context is, should there be a hierarchy in institutions/government or non-government offices /in families?

 

Evolution of civilisation, from the early cave-men age to the present time of the internet, there are two principles prevalent in human life: competition and hierarchy.

These two kinds of strategies gave the human race the excellency of life and a higher level of perception than the animal world.

But sad to tell that some morbid argument day by day, years after years, destroying the earth. The culprit is The UN and its western allies. To name, America, Europe and their replicator - India.

Regarding human Rights- how many rights a person should use/exercise in a public community. A person needs a clear understanding of human rights: man and woman- both be equally respected or gender-based human rights? Should our children be exposed to sex and violence? Or does public exposition need a measured code/censored materials for objects of expression/ exposition?

This is the least demand of an ordinary person to be cleared by the scholars/sociologists/ scientists, and if the need arises for a reformation should take place all over the globe accordingly.

 

Competition for profit or a prize; honour; or advantage; rivalry for supremacy; skill or ability; A simultaneous demand by two or more organisms for a limited environmental resource, such as nutrients, living space, or light, food,  and other vital requirements made civilisation progressive. It discovered the knowledge; explored all for the safety of humans living on this planet.

 

But when you reserve a quota for a category of persons like tribes or gender-based, you apply discrimination; you break the law of equality; you start to withdraw respect for others' talent and quality; you shatter the dream of deserved persons it's a crime! The UN is such a criminal organisation. It has become a female-gendered based organisation and killing men throughout all countries.

 

Since 2010, the creation of the UN Women by Ban Ki-moon (a South Korean politician and diplomat), till today (under the tenure of António Guterres, a Portuguese politician and diplomat), the UN is advising the member states/countries to give special favour to women that made the western and English countries and the Indian subcontinent a place of men's killing field.

We, men, are angry and disappointed with the UN and find it is a discriminatory body curtailing men's rights in the name of women empowerment. In the last decade, we have seen the trap of feminism/feminity/autonomy /feminine perspectives are killing men. Could you please, tell me, if women can not see themselves through the prism of men's perspectives, why then men should see themselves through the prism of women's feminity and perspectives? Is it justified? The discrimination in human rights between genders has made men's life miserable.

 

The UN becomes a centre of power. I ask the UN chief, can You recommend a law to the diverse natured planet to be uniform and justified?

Between two or more diverse regions, like the coastal and the desert region; high and low; the hot zone and colder zone; the poor economy and high rich economy; are not the same to the local native people. The UN can not recommend sitting in New York with poor ideas made from a female perspective.  Nor show its power to member states. It's the wrong idea.

The world became a killing field of humans; many genocides took place at the beginning of the twentieth century. The two world wars caused destruction and human tragedy, followed by the devastating communist' horrific killing of innocent men. We find that communism which killed millions and ruled many countries is no more today.
We think and believe the same, that the feminist's ideals which is western countries stupidity and concept sponsored by the UN killing innocent men, will evaporate to zero in the coming days.
We believe in science and math. We believe in the evolution which made humans hard-wired in their respective basic instinct and nature - men as hunters and creators women are the inferior reproductive helper. Men never denied the well-being existence of women and their human rights.
When we look at the USA, we see a deep moral corruptness that most crimes relating to sex and violence happen in that country. Most US presidents have sex scandals apart from politics. The news says most presidents are notorious womanisers. It is shame for a nation! Have you noticed their culture is gynocentric? The female celebrities are licensed to show the body to attract men audience. Most female singers have no talent. So, they expose naked bodies publicly, and the US call it talent.
 
 American children are most vulnerable to sex and violence. Juvenile crimes involving sex are rapidly increasing. Rape is a synonym of US. The root of rape culture is women's perspective and cancerous feminism.
 Look at China, the most populous country. 145 crore. The US population has only 30 crores. China never suffers like the US. Women in China are happier than in the US. We understand the need for women empowerment. But we, too aware of the need for men empowerment that is more urgent.
When we look at human lives, most men work outside their homes. Men take life risks at work. And as usual, women's nature is staying at home with children. Men bring food for the families. Provide all necessities to family welfares.
Around 1960,  Women in Europe and America are demanding equality. What is equality? Do you have a reservation for women for the American President? Since 1920 suffragette, the 19th amendment of US constitution, equality is given to women But can you tell me do women have the equal power to be matched with men? Nobel prize is an indicator of human excellency. Now, tell me in the last 60 years, except showing female bodies, the nudity and sluttiness, what excellent performing success women have?
Do you demand a quota for the Nobel prize for women? For equality?
Feminity and autonomy are not the humanely quality. Feminity is another word for sex and reproduction, and women's autonomy is not applicable in public space. A semi-naked woman can not attract the attention of crowds. Public space requires an equally shared code of conduct, not to create any conflict among many where one can not hurt another. Not sexually, politically and religiously.
The UN Women sponsoring and endorsing women to be sexualised and under the protection of the UN. This is not the right thing to do it goes against men's security and human rights. Why do women force men to gaze at her nudity? The problem the US is facing with its population 30 crores China is not facing with its largest population 145 crores. It proves that western women are the only problem in society.
 
Today male population of the world is under threat from the UN. Because the UN Women is spreading hatred against men and there is a lack of Men commission/office in the UN to maintain an equal balance between men and women.
Women from all walks of life are not marginalised. Nor they are deprived of their due respect and presence. And women are not a victim like men. Every year, 81 per cent of homicide is men. But amazingly, the UN uses men power to exploit and never took initiatives to secure men's lives and stop the killing.
The world needs competition and hierarchy for the human race. Not a quota can justify equality or level. The human race and animal world never enjoyed equal status, and not enjoying now or never will enjoy. The fittest will survive under any circumstance. The evolution says a leopard can not change its spots, and the basic instinct, the same nature that binds women, can never override men's supremacy. Its evolution, not created cultures, quotas or laws.

-Albert Ashok